Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 2661 - 2680 of 11,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2020, 2:50 am by Léon Dijkman
District Court for the Northern District of California, requesting it to set the terms for a global FRAND-licence. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:42 pm by William Ford
Foreign nationals who have been in China or Iran within the previous 14 days are barred from entering the U.S. altogether, pursuant to two presidential proclamations. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:42 pm by William Ford
Foreign nationals who have been in China or Iran within the previous 14 days are barred from entering the U.S. altogether, pursuant to two presidential proclamations. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:04 am by William Ford, Elliot Setzer
.: The House Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs will hold a hearing on the State Department's budget request for the fiscal year 2021. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 11:34 am by Amy Howe
” Last year, in a lawsuit brought by a group of Central Americans who were returned to Mexico and several organizations who provide services to migrants, a federal court barred the Trump administration from enforcing the “remain in Mexico” policy anywhere in the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 7:56 am by Bob Ambrogi
The Supreme Court’s request that the bar form this study group came in response to an earlier letter to the court from Stewart suggesting the study. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:06 pm by Elliot Setzer
The court ban applies only to areas in its jurisdiction, namely Arizona and California. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
District Court for the Central District of California ruled that the U.S. securities class action lawsuit brought against Toshiba by investors who had purchased the company’s unsponsored Level I American Depository Receipts (ADRs) in the U.S. can proceed. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:10 pm by Bob Ambrogi
The Florida Supreme Court has asked The Florida Bar to undertake a study of the rules governing the practice of law in order to determine whether revisions are needed to improve the delivery of legal services within that state. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Brent Kendall reports that “[t]he central question in the case … was whether such state prosecutions were barred by a provision of federal immigration law that says any information submitted with federal work-authorization forms can’t be used for state law-enforcement purposes”; “[i]n dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the court’s liberal wing, said U.S. immigration… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
Several people in the bar section walk over and greet the Scalias and Mulvaney before court begins. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am by Amy Howe
Seila Law refused to respond fully to the CFPB’s request for information and documents, prompting the agency to go to federal court in California to enforce the request. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 12:27 pm by Elliot Setzer
Bonnie Jenkins, the former coordinator for threat reduction programs at the State Department; Richard Johnson, the former director for nonproliferation at the National Security Council; and Stephen Rademaker, a former assistant secretary of state in the Bureaus of Arms Control and International Security and Nonproliferation. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 11:11 am by John B. Palley
I do not know of any other attorney in the state who operates on such a narrow focus. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
On the civil side: First up are California v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Devin Nunes, calling for a congressional investigation into how the California Republican is paying for his lawsuits against media companies and critics. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:59 pm by Ilya Somin
NCAA have ruled that Section 1373 is itself unconstitutional, because it violates Supreme Court precedent barring federal commandeering of state and local governments. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:03 am by Teresa Snider and Abby Chin
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently granted DoorDash drivers’ motion to compel arbitration, which may ultimately cost DoorDash nearly $12 million in American Arbitration Association (AAA) filing fees. [read post]