Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 28,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
§ 25-503: Order for Support; Methods of Payment; Modification; Termination; Statute of Limitations; Judgment on Arrearages; Notice; Security Arizona ex rel DES v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 1:25 pm
Under New York law, incarceration is a possible consequence for the willful nonpayment of child support. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:08 pm
In the recent case of Davila v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
In United States v McDaniel, Eleventh Circuit No. 15038, the Court stated that the child “Vicky” was a victim. [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:56 am
In a contested custody cased, in Matter of Horowitz v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 7:15 am
In Patrick v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 7:51 am
Matter of Chang v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
On March 19, the Court will hear oral argument in Astrue v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am
Shepherd v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:59 am
The case of Matter of Shuffler v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:04 am
Last week, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued its opinion in Coronado v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:58 am
To impose an order re: civil contempt in a child support case the court must make a finding that the party to be held in contempt had the ability to pay child support but willfully refused. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:36 am
He has just begun appealing his conviction and sentence.The case is Kennedy v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:09 am
See the full opinion in Scroggs/Gariepy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:24 am
Moore In a recent case brought for appellate review, Moore v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:47 am
R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [2008] UKHL 14; WLR (D) 64 “A child who had been provided with accommodation by the housing department of a local authority but had not been brought to the attention of their children's services department had not been ‘looked after’ under s 22(1) of the Children Act 1989 and was accordingly not entitled, having reached 18, to support under the Act as a ‘former relevant… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm
However, in the 1998 case of Macias v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:03 pm
On August 31, 2011, the Oregon Court of Appeals decided Division of Family Support Unit v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 8:23 pm
Its decision in June in Kennedy v. [read post]
