Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 48,947
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
Clemente v Mindmere Ltd (LANDLORD AND TENANT – ADMINISTRATION CHARGE – recovery of costs as an administration charge when incurred) (Rev1) (2024) UKUT 50 (LC) An appeal on a determination of reasonableness of an administration charge. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:27 am
In 2006, in Jones v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
There were a couple of interesting objection cases that came down recently, and we'll have a post on those soon, but first, we'd like to share this cautionary tale, as set forth in the very specialized blog Freelance Rights, published by one of the objectors in a case entitled Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
Additional Resources: AG: NJ to Receive $2.7 Million from Settlement with Drug Maker, Jan. 19, 2016, PolitickerNJ More Blog Entries: Cisson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
Additional Resources: AG: NJ to Receive $2.7 Million from Settlement with Drug Maker, Jan. 19, 2016, PolitickerNJ More Blog Entries: Cisson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
Additional Resources: AG: NJ to Receive $2.7 Million from Settlement with Drug Maker, Jan. 19, 2016, PolitickerNJ More Blog Entries: Cisson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:32 am
Additional Resources: AG: NJ to Receive $2.7 Million from Settlement with Drug Maker, Jan. 19, 2016, PolitickerNJ More Blog Entries: Cisson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 6:32 am
[1]Sattva Capital Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:18 pm
KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:26 am
—Hermann Goering In EEOC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:48 am
The defendant did not disclose the costs it incurred in bringing its motion. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 4:29 am
Judgment Released: May 7, 2010 Link to Judgment A costs order under section 86 of the Construction Lien Act is made in the court’s discretion and may be made on a substantial indemnity basis subject to section 86(2), stating that the costs allowed to a party shall not exceed what would have been incurred had that party [...] [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:53 am
Judgment Released: July 13, 2010 Link to Judgment Costs of $9,219.87 for an undertakings and refusals motion, where the claim totalled $3.4 million, were not disproportionate. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:40 am
Judgment Released: February 9, 2010 Link to Judgment Rule 20.06(1), addressing costs awards under the new summary-judgment rules, states that “[w]here, on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party obtains no relief, the court shall fix the opposite party’s costs of the motion on a substantial indemnity basis and order the moving party to pay them [...] [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
Judgment Released: June 7, 2010 Link to Judgment Where the defendants claimed to have spent $2,129.45 on their unsuccessful motion for summary judgment, it was disproportionate to then claim $9,546.28 in costs for successfully resisting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to appeal the plaintiffs’ costs award on the summary-judgment motion. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
Supreme Court decides Michigan v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 11:44 am
On December 3, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 11:44 am
On December 3, 2013, the Supreme Court issued its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
Supreme Court decides Michigan v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:25 pm
Kan. 2006) (Zubulake is the leading case on "cost-shifting of electronic discovery"); Quinby v. [read post]
