Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE" Results 2661 - 2680 of 4,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
Renewed trouble in Iraq dominated this week’s headlines. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:This Essay, prepared for a Notre Dame Law Review symposium on the catalysts of constitutional change during the twentieth century, takes as its focus the Warren Court’s landmark decision in Griswold v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:05 am by Ritika Singh
Orin Kerr writes in the Volokh Conspiracy about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am by John Elwood
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The second Ordinance seeks to amend the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act passed by Parliament earlier this year to carve out India’s 29th State- Telangana from the erstwhile undivided State of Andhra Pradesh.[2] This Ordinance makes certain amendments to the territories covered by the Khammam district under this State bifurcation law. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States); whether it violates the “privileges or immunities” of a businessman who wants to operate a ferry service to be denied a permit to compete with an existing service on a public lake in Washington State (Courtney v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:39 am by Patricia Salkin
Smith Communications, LLC v Washington County, 2014 WL 2450067 (WD Ark 6/2/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
 Thus encouraging and accelerating such innovation must be the dominant focus of any serious climate policy. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:11 am by admin
., non-criminal) “reviewable matters” under the Act include abuse of dominance (or monopolization as it is referred to in the United States under the Sherman Act), civil misleading advertising, refusal to deal, price maintenance and certain types of “vertical” restraints by dominant firms (e.g., exclusive dealing and tied selling). [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:39 pm
These laws were invalidated by a unanimous decision of the “conservative” Supreme Court in Buchanan v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 1:40 pm
In part because of Earl Warren’s desire to achieve unanimity, the Brown opinion does not actually overrule Plessy v. [read post]