Search for: "Davis v. State" Results 2661 - 2680 of 5,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Davis, for Plaintiff-Appellant.Shelley Luan Hopkins, for Defendant-Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 1:13-CV-193.Before: SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.[*]The Smiths appeal the district court's denial of their motion to remand their case to state court. [read post]
This post in our Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series discusses the Montana Supreme Court’s consideration of an insurer’s duty to defend in National Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, where a trial court sets a specific deadline for expert disclosure, it has the discretion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to impose appropriate sanctions if a party fails to comply with the deadline (see MacDonald v Leif, 89 AD3d 995; Pirro Group, LLC v One Point St., Inc., 71 AD3d 654; Bomzer v Parke-Davis, 41 AD3d 522; Maiorino v City of New York, 39 AD3d 601) . [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:27 am by Nabiha Syed
At the Michigan View, Jeffrey Hadden previews next week’s oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:30 am
But in the meantime, I thought our readers would be interested in another context in which DOJ interpretations have occasioned recent controversy: the current Second Amendment case in the Supreme Court, D.C. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:42 am by Ben Sheffner
In his original order, Judge Davis declined to reach the constitutional issues, citing United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:42 am
Interestingly, the day after Stinson was charged with a crime, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals decided Davis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:28 pm
 Davis. [5] Notwithstanding this state of affairs, I am satisfied there should be a recording. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am by Rick Esenberg
” In 1986, after years of confused and contradictory litigation in the lower courts, the Supreme Court affirmed the possibility of political-gerrymandering claims in Davis v. [read post]