Search for: "Does 1-58"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 2,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
UPDATE, 1:51 a.m.: Whatever Chappelle actually does in his show, it's obvious that he thought he'd have a few hundred people, not several thousand. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 7:58 am
10:44: OUTBURST #1! [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:23 pm
With respect to Exhibit 57 in particular, Agent Taylor testified that the e-mail was submitted to the server at 2:23:58, a version created for defendant at 2:23:58, and the version so created delivered to defendant at 2:23:58. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 8:23 pm
Sterling Heights, MI: Speeding 58 in a 40, Reduced to Zero Points and not reported to Secretary of State. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:57 pm
On the view that I would prefer, such legality is beside the point: certainly, if a State may exercise jurisdiction (by general IL), the conclusion rather suggests itself that it does; conversely, where a State must not act, it usually does not act. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 1:33 am
Lister, 852 N.E.2d 50, 58 (Ind. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:59 am
" The Task Force hopes this recommendation will lessen costs such as the estimated $58 million spent by San Francisco on nonprofit indirect costs in the fiscal year 2007-08. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:17 am
It does not constitute an admission of guilt. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 12:49 pm
The chart does not yield an easy answer to my question, but it does show that at least one frequently told story about extreme nominees is not true: a friendly Senate is no guarantee that a president will choose an extreme nominee. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
Several law firms are cutting associate pay.In any event, for the first time since the beginning of the year, we are seeing a slowdown in terms of overall layoff numbers:1,125 (May 2009)1,500 (April 2009)3,500 (March 2009)2,000 (February 2009)1,500 (January 2009)Does this mean that the worst of the layoffs are behind us? [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
A judicial officer does not know the details of the case the parties will present and in theory cannot know the details. [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:04 am
Justice Davey stated at 689 that a plaintiff seeking damages for personal injuries “… ought to call all doctors who attended him in respect of any important aspect of the matters that are in dispute, or explain why he does not do so”. [58] That approach was modified in Buksh v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:18 am
Town of Bedford, 58 AD3d 225, 231 [2d Dept 2008], quoting Hochhauser v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Parkchester South Condominiums, 287 F.3d 58 (4/12/02). [read post]
25 May 2009, 2:48 am
In any event, for the first time since the beginning of the year, we are seeing a slowdown in terms of overall layoff numbers:1,125 (May 2009)1,500 (April 2009)3,500 (March 2009)2,000 (February 2009)1,500 (January 2009)Does this mean that the worst of the layoffs are behind us? [read post]
24 May 2009, 11:37 pm
This court cannot allow Lumileds to escape its agreements due to a merger that does not disturb its contract with Epistar. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:50 pm
Issues Addressed 1) Spoliation of Evidence and Duty to Preserve Evidence. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:50 pm
Issues Addressed 1) Spoliation of Evidence and Duty to Preserve Evidence. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:10 am
., 741 A.2d 356, 357-58 (Del. 1998), Chancellor Chandler noted that he had to consider: (1) a preliminary assessment of likelihood of success on the merits of the appeal; (2) whether the petitioner will suffer irreparable injury if the stay is not granted; (3) whether any other interested party will suffer substantial harm if the stay is granted; and (4) whether the public interest will be harmed if the stay is granted. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:08 pm
There are several reasons: 1. [read post]
