Search for: "Free v. State" Results 2661 - 2680 of 35,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2024, 2:24 am by Frank Cranmer
In February 2021, Dr Miller took part in an event called “Building the Campaign for Free Speech” at which he spoke of being publicly criticised for his views on Palestine and Israel. [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 9:06 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
While the state high court did find the truck driver and his employer were free from liability once local officials gave the all-clear for through-traffic, it found the government could be liable because sovereign immunity was not applicable in this case, as was waived by state statute. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:12 pm
All the recent talk here about free speech online is proving extremely relevant. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:46 pm
In an increasingly socially networked world, the Fourth Amendment may fail to protect precisely those liberties - to live in the company of others free from state surveillance and intrusion - the Constitution should protect. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:59 pm by Mark Murakami
Update:  the Supreme Court is considering the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 11:57 am by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Don Willett's opinion yesterday in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:20 am by Lucy Cass, Olswang LLP
  The Court noted that the right to free movement is a qualified right, which in this case is validly limited by the terms of the Accession Treaty and 2004 Directive. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am by David Gans
On Monday, Constitutional Accountability Center filed an amici curiae brief in the Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 4:38 am by SHG
And given that every idiot is entitled to free speech, there isn’t a lot you can lawfully do about vulgar signs, right? [read post]