Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 10:26 am
The Amarillo Court of Appeals held that this amounted to harmful error. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:45 am
Tivo Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 4:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:51 am
In 2010 the US Supreme Court disallowed sentences of life without parole for juveniles convicted of non-homicide crimes in Graham v. [read post]
Fisher v. University of Texas, Justice Kennedy, and the Text and History of the Fourteenth Amendment
28 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm
” In 2007, in Parents Involved v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 7:35 am
Shown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The court further held that the trial judge had not been wrong to dismiss the appellant’s submission on non-prosecution assurances and had correctly applied the test in R v Abu Hamza [2007] QB 659. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 11:19 am
In Mayor of Baltimore City v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 6:00 pm
Moore-Thomas v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 11:20 am
An excerpt: The panel affirmed the district court’s grant of the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ motion for summary judgment and ejectment order in an action brought by a group of recreational vehicle owners seeking to retain their rights to remain on a lakeside RV park located on American Indian land held in trust by the Bureau. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Sullivan implicitly held exactly the same thing. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
In United States Civil Service Commission v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:22 am
You can read the Supreme Court decision at Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 4:49 am
Ham v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
In State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 3:35 am
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Universal Church v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:33 am
The Court held that the concept of indirect discrimination has never required an explanation of the reasons why a particular PCP puts one group at a disadvantage when compared with others. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 9:00 pm
”Referring to Kennedy v. [read post]
