Search for: "High v State" Results 2661 - 2680 of 35,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Nicklin in Craig Wright v Roger Ver ([2019] EWHC 2094 (QB)) confirms the high hurdle that a claimant must overcome in a defamation case where section 9 of the Defamation Act 2013 applies. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:47 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Stangroom & Anor v Brown [2012] EWCA Civ 424 (04 April 2012) Foley Independent News & Media Ltd & Ors v Lord Ashcroft KCMG [2012] EWCA Civ 423 (04 April 2012) Salimi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 422 (04 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Jeeg Global Ltd v Hare [2012] EWHC 871 (QB) (04 April 2012) Burn… [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:07 am
In Zeckler v Assigned Risk Pool Manager Capita Commercial Services Ltd [2012], the High Court held, on appeal, that the Solicitors Indemnity Insurance Rules 2009 r.10.3 (the Rule) could not be relied upon to hold personally liable a partner in a limited liability partnership for the partnership's unpaid professional indemnity insurance premiums.The appellant (Zeckler) had been one of two partners in a limited liability solicitors' practice, Zecklers LLP. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:34 pm
The high court normally holds its conference on Wednesday, but this week's was moved to avoid conflict with a state judicial conference. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am by Derek T. Muller
The dissenting opinion also does not engage the majority opinion’s reliance on a state case called Luse v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 12:47 pm
  The United States Supreme Court will examine this issue in a case with far-reaching implications - Scott v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 6:22 am by Timothy P. Flynn
After Atkins, the High Court provided scant additional guidance, holding that states could not rely on any single factor, such as a low IQ, in making the mental disability determination.In any death penalty case, there are two trials: one determines guilty or innocence; the other determines punishment at a sentencing trial. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:01 am by Walter Olson
A mini-roundup: “How State Pension Funds — and 401k Managers — Prioritize Politics over Returns” [Ike Brannon, Cato/Forbes.com; related, Eric V. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Florida court blocks drug-related seizure of house as violation of Constitution’s Excessive Fines Clause [Orlando Weekly, opinion in Agresta v. [read post]