Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 2661 - 2680
of 7,664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2016, 9:24 am
Yesterday marked the 10th anniversary of my first post welcoming readers to this Blog. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
I have to admit, I’m a skeptic. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
When we think about shape marks/trade dress, they’re almost invariably limping TMs, with other things on the product we can use to ID source. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Session 1, cont’dMid-Point Discussants: Mark Janis: The functionality doctrine is not good at doing the work we’re expecting it to do, both in trade dress and design patents. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Mark Lemley: Intermediate approaches in general may not be a bad idea, but worries that we’re not very good with “you’re in the door, but only a little bit, so you get very narrow rights. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 12:03 pm
We’re very grateful for that. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
“As a matter of logic, PLM’s intention was to create a mark that was distinguishable from its prior mark. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:07 am
June 7, 2016 - 11 AM: In re American Textile Company , Serial No. 86287417 [Section 2(d) refusal of EVERSOFT for "Bed blankets; Blanket throws; Blankets for outdoor use; Children's blankets; Children's bed sheets, pillow cases, and blankets; Fleece blankets; Lap blankets; Pet blankets; Receiving blankets," on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark EVER SOFT for "yarns and threads"].June 7, 2016 - 2 PM: In re… [read post]
27 May 2016, 6:52 pm
Congreso y más de 3 mil 500 invitados, re- presentantes de organizaciones políticas, de masas, sociales y de diferentes instituciones, incluyendo la participación de los diputados. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm
Panel on “fluid,” legacy & heritage marks – @MariaBaratta discussing Macy’s v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:01 pm
There have been a number of comparisons between former Arizona Republican Senator Barry Goldwater’s bid for president in 1964 and the presidential run currently being undertaken by Donald Trump—all of them have been strikingly off the mark. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:38 am
Mark Glaser was definitely not lovin' it when his mark was refused. [read post]
23 May 2016, 9:01 pm
But, more importantly, as Mark Joseph Stern recently pointed out on Slate, there is “overwhelming evidence and professional consensus” that this fear is entirely baseless. [read post]
22 May 2016, 11:16 am
The cycles of hype and disappointment around an artificial pancreas gives me quite a bit of sympathy for older lawyers who have been through many such cycles re artificial intelligence. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Méthot c. [read post]
20 May 2016, 3:15 pm
We’re going to destroy it. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am
Klass: if the law feels comfortable marking out statements that cause false beliefs as illegal, that presupposes a highly cognitive liberal subject. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:40 am
Said: we’re not all on the same page on harm. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:24 pm
I’m kind of obsessed with all the issues involved in this case. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:45 am
“There’s equipment we would use that I’m not going to discuss,” he said. [read post]
