Search for: "In re Rogers" Results 2661 - 2680 of 2,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2011, 8:52 am by Editor Charlie
This is definitely a decision based on current widespread use of earbuds, and it remains an important philosophical question when doing re-issues of old recordings with this problem. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 5:59 am by Jim Sedor
Dannel Malloy’s re-election campaign began even before Election Day 2014, emails between the U.S. attorney’s office and the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC) show. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:42 pm
Day seven of the CRTC's network management hearing featured just one company: Bell. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
" KSR's brief never cited In re Kotzab, 217 F.3d 1365, or Ruiz v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:23 pm by Karina Lytvynska
By Iris Ziwei Che In the world of financial instability, the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
… Major Philosophers rarely or never cited Heraclitus, Parmenides, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Protagoras, Epicurus, Zeno of Citium, Plotinus, Epictetus, Gregory the Great, John the Scot, Avicenna, Averroes, Roger Bacon, John Calvin, Baruch Spinoza, George Berkeley, Henri Bergson, Alfred North Whitehead and Søren Kierkegaard, all named in that earlier list of major philosophers, fill that bill. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by patrickdaniellaw
But that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re automatically accepted by insurance companies. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  The House counters that they’re misreading those statutes and that therefore there aren’t any appropriated funds for major parts of the project.In both cases, the Executive branch is arguing that the House (or its Committee) lacks Article III standing to sue. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Dec. 15, 2011);  In re Frito-Lay N. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:49 am by Benson Varghese
Rogers (2019) Officer performed “takedown” on non-resisting suspec [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Dec. 15, 2011);  In re Frito-Lay N. [read post]