Search for: "JUSTICE DEPT." Results 2661 - 2680 of 3,152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm by Jim Gerl
(Justice Souter's dissent has some fun with this phrase noting that "When a mother tells a boy that he may go out and play after his homework is done, he knows what she means. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Justice Austin ruled, and on appeal the Second Department agreed, that Kun failed to establish her ownership of shares in Bucked Tooth. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by Glenn
That doesn’t necessarily mean the Justice Dept. is going to, or should, change or withdraw the ASCAP decrees. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:30 am by Maya Efrati
The Dept. of Justice’s increased reliance on whistleblower information demonstrates that these tips are high-quality and allow law enforcement to identify and prioritize the best cases – those frauds which include significant criminal activity and large amounts of illegal funds, and where the available or ascertainable evidence is strong. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:26 am by Daniel E. Katz
Hammons, 285 A.D.2d 417, 727 N.Y.S.2d 880 (1st Dept. 2001), in support of its decision, in which the Appellate Division had refused to recognize the claimant as a prevailing party under the catalyst theory. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204 [setting aside EIR’s GHG analysis as lacking supporting substantial evidence].) [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
For the latter reason, the applicants argue that the Order is not neutral and generally applicable for purposes of Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:55 am by Bernard Bell
Dep’t of Justice, Final Rule —Office of Special Counsel, 64 Fed. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Halse v Halse, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 850604 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Maybaum v Maybaum, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5244417 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the defendant wife and the plaintiff husband were married on March 13, 1995. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
When foodborne illness outbreaks occur, the source of the contamination is not always clear. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
The motion was shot down in a ruling from the bench by Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Jerome C. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:49 am by Jim Sedor
Should the justices reject Arizona’s commission, at least one other, in California, is also likely to be in peril. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Sec. of Dept. of Children and Family Servs., 358 F.3d 804, 817 (11th Cir. 2004) ('We conclude that it is a strained and ultimately incorrect reading of Lawrence to interpret it to announce a new fundamental right.'). [read post]