Search for: "Jacks v. State"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 2,864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
Adrian Vermeule I thank Jack Balkin for his good offices in organizing the symposium on Common Good Constitutionalism (CGC), and also thank the participants for their thoughts. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 10:38 am
V. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:35 pm
As I have written before, Jack Balkin explains it better than I do: This article argues that the debate between originalism and living constitutionalism offers a false dichotomy. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
" In McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
See, e.g., Jack Michael Beermann, Major Questions, Delegation, Chevron and the Anti-Innovation Supreme Court at 8 (March 9, 2023) (“This article also illustrates how the Court is doing a poor job providing clear instructions to lower courts and other government entities on how and in some cases even whether to apply its doctrines. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Long-time friends of Patrick and Georgina were Jack and Grace Baker whom they came to know while living in Guelph…. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 11:59 pm
In Chong v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:20 am
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
” Loving Plot: This film follows the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
Smith In the six years since the landmark Kelo v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:01 am
The case, decided over 10 years ago by then-Vice Chancellor Jack B. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
Table 1: Sales Tax Treatment of Food is Haphazard in State Tax Codes Unequal Treatment of Groceries, Candy, and Soda in State Tax Codes as of January 1, 2018 State State General Sales Tax Grocery Treatment Candy Treated the Same as Groceries? [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:02 am
And on the international stage, they have adopted counterterrorism rhetoric to mobilize support or deflect criticism – accusing other States of making statements “in support of terrorism,” urging supporters of the pending ICJ case (South Africa v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Response to the scandal and convictions of lobbyist Jack Abramoff and former Reps. [read post]
