Search for: "Jones v. District Court"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 3,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2009, 1:52 pm
(For Ninth Circuit practitioners, it may be interesting to note that the trigger for Herrmann’s and Beck’s post was last month’s Supreme Court decision in Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:00 am
Section 36 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal Decision in Jones, et al., v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:45 am
At issue was the district court's denial of class certification, which found there were not enough common issues, too many individual issues, that the plaintiffs were not typical, you get the picture.The 11th reversed, and noted that -- unlike Title VII claims -- under Klay v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:56 am
In the meantime, what happens when inadequate discovery is provided was the feature in one 8th District case last week, State v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:21 am
On Tuesday, March 31, 2009, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Gross v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:44 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 8:04 am
Darryl Jones, Defendant-Appellant.2009 WL 1444252(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
23 May 2009, 4:05 am
Much of the Court's discussion of the pleading requirements, is based on its recent prior decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:36 pm
District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently issued an order requiring the Boston U.S. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:51 am
District Court for the District of Massachusetts has issued an order requiring the Boston U.S. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:05 pm
See, e.g., Jones v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:30 pm
District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
Jones v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 11:47 am
Debra Williams Jones, No. 121,049 on the docket of the 32nd Judicial District Court for the Parish of Terrebonne. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:58 am
Bosland Comments: The decision is interesting on two counts: (1) the Court's reliance on Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:46 pm
To similar effect were Judge Jones's rulings in Evans v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:11 am
April 29, 2009): We begin by addressing the first two factors relied upon by the district court: Neely's decision to hand his keys to Officer Tran and leave the driver's door open after exiting the vehicle. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:20 am
" Because Morris failed to establish that his mother had an FMLA-covered serious health condition, the Court affirmed the award of summary judgment to Family Dollar on his interference claim.Comment: The decision is interesting on two counts: (1) the Court's reliance on Jones v. [read post]
