Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 6,272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2015, 6:12 am
” In another post at PrawfsBlawg, Wasserman discusses the later proceedings on remand in Tolan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
However, as discussed in Proskauer’s blog, in a fairly concurrent case, the US District Court for the Central District of California, in Jennifer Davies v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 3:09 pm
Supreme Court in its 1999 Davis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 12:30 pm
Davis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:04 am
It is styled, Angela Glidewell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In such cases, the Supreme Court has made clear in Washington v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849, 855 (Tex. 2002). [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849, 855 (Tex. 2002). [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:27 am
Davis. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:20 pm
They do not invoke the Fourteenth Amendment in so many words but, as I read it, they are alleging that the use of the altered forms violates their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment in two respects:(i) First, although the plaintiffs do not argue that a marriage performed pursuant to such a license would be invalid under Kentucky law (to the contrary--see the quotation from Pinkhasov v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 6:04 am
Oct. 11, 2011), Davis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
This post is based on a Davis Polk client memorandum by Mr. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 5:11 am
Federal law does not establish criminal penalties for violations of Davis-Bacon. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:29 am
Davis can reject gay applicants for marriage as inconsistent with God’s law according to this argument; but she can also enforce God’s laws in every other way. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 297 N.W.2d 252, 258 (Minn. 1980); Dadd v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
(Cyprus) v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:16 am
& Hosp. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 2:44 am
Meanwhile, yesterday in Davis v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:33 pm
GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
The Court found this was "testimonial" evidence, under Crawford and Davis v. [read post]
