Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
(See p. 54 of the report issued by the RAND Corporation supporting Carter’s decision.) [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:01 pm
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:20 am
Editor’s Note: This article is part of a three-part Lawfare series on how to address federal privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
Section 6(g) of the FTC Act authorizes the commission: “From time to time to classify corporations and to make rules and regulations for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of sections 41 to 46 and 47 to 58 of this title. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE: The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IPRoo), Review of National Innovation System – Key points for corporate counsel: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Review of National Innovation System recommends creative commons: (creativecommons.org), Review of Innovation System released: (IP Menu News), What [right]’s in a [business] name: Westpac Banking Corporation v McMillan & Melbas On The Park Pty Ltd (formerly Credit Systems Australia Pty Ltd): (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Senator… [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
Rates of C. difficile, the most common hospital-based infection in the United States, continue to climb. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It is also ultra vires under well-established law.The seminal case applying the municipal cost recovery rule (sometimes also called the "free public services doctrine") is a sixty-year old Supreme Court case called United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am
” Leahy emphasized recent rulings in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
We might thank Freud and perhaps Jung (and others of course), for the extension of the psychology of individuals to the incarnated personalities of bodies corporate, like the state. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:17 am
The court gave no reason, but there had been vocal opposition to the proposal from the State Bar Association and county bars. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP Watchdog) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual Property Watch) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (IAM) (Public Knowledge) (Patent Baristas) (PatentBIOtech) (Patent Docs) Member states endorse senior WIPO appointments (WIPO) (Afro-IP) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Intellectual Property Watch) (IAM) Ocean Tomo sells patent deal business for $10 million (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) Global Global - General… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court rulings, including this month's Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
State Bd. of Education (1982) 32 Cal.3d 779, 795; Bozung v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
