Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
The provisional view of Hodge Ch communicated to the objectors stated: “[13]. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am
Lord Templeman referred to the principle in Salomon v Salomon & co Ltd [1896] UKHL 1, as the ‘unyielding rock’ on which company law is constructed. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
Like many of this weblog's readers, this Kat has long nurtured a fascination and deep admiration for the United States Federal judiciary. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm
This problem, at least in part, appears to have been recognised by the House of Lords in Fourie v Le Roux [2007] UKHL 1 where Lord Scott of Foscote said:“I think it needs to be understood that the difference between costs at the standard rate and costs on an indemnity basis is, according to the language of the relevant rules, not very great. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 12:57 am
In Sutcliffe v Secretary of State for Education [2024] EWHC 1878 (Admin), Pepperall J commenced his judgment as follows: “[1]. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am
Section 23 does not refer to a requirement to provide accommodation under Part VI of the Act for the straightforward reason that there is, as Lord Justice Bean explains, no such requirement. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
You just suggested what the plain text of the consent decree states unequivocally is prohibited conduct! [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
NVidia v Hardware Labs [2016] EWHC 3135(December 2016)This was the exam question posed here. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
Lord Justice Kitchin ran through jurisprudence including the CJEU’s decisions in Pammer (2010), L'Oréal v eBay (2011), and Nintendo (September 2017) along with the German Supreme Court’s Parfummarken (November 2017). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
Over in the States, London-based solicitor Mark Lewis is working with Norman Siegel of Siegel Teitelbaum & Evans LLP and Steven Hyman of McLaughlin & Stern LLP to look into allegations of phone hacking in the US. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Lord Rodger cites McHugh and Kirby JJ (High Court of Australia, Applicants S396/2002 and S395/2002 v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:36 am
The AG’s opinion certainly reads like he closely studied, and perhaps sought inspiration from, Lord Leggatt’s leading judgment in Lloyd v Google (see our analysis of that decision here). [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
The problem, stated at its most general, is simple. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:33 am
The Limitations Act states, 4. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:54 am
According to Caterpillar,despite the requirement laid down by the Court of Appeal in Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch 117 and Roger Bullivant Ltd v Ellis (1987) ICR 464 that the confidential information be identified, the court could still apply the principle established by the House of Lords in Bolkiah v KPMG [1998] UKHL 52 that an ex-employee can be barred from carrying out specified work for a new employer unless that employee is able to… [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
The blog also notes the ICO’s disappointment with the recent report of the House of Lords European Union Committee on the ‘right to be forgotten’. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:56 am
In Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v. [read post]
