Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 2661 - 2680
of 13,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
The manager willful violated Rule 204(b)-1. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
For more information or for assistance drafting a document retention policy, please contact Norton Rose Fulbright Canada, LLP. [1] Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp), s 230(4)(b). [2] Canada Business Corporations Act, RSC 1985, c C-44, s 20-21. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 9:33 am
M is for Marriage Bonus & Marriage Penalty. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
The Board noted that its decision is in accord with the Examination Guide, which states that "[m]arks containing elements of flags in stylized or incomplete form are not refused under Section 2(b). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:01 am
G.S. 15A-401(b)(1),(b)(2)(f.). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
As s.81 and 88(1)(b) envisaged joint tenants, the draftsman would have been clear if the death of one of joint tenants was intended at s.89.On s.88(1)(b), which reads:88. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
As s.81 and 88(1)(b) envisaged joint tenants, the draftsman would have been clear if the death of one of joint tenants was intended at s.89.On s.88(1)(b), which reads:88. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:42 pm
Pregunta 1 ¿Quién es el cliente? [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
La Corte sostuvo que:1. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:02 am
Finally, two New-Hampshire-specific details: [1.] [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:23 am
But thanks to Section 114(d)(1)(B)(i), even those retransmissions are exempt if they don’t go “more than a radius of 150 miles from the site of the radio broadcast transmitter”. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:51 am
1. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
(b) What would the "correct" accounting rule do? [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
& Tech. 1 (Fall 2011). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:02 pm
I'm on the fence about this concern. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 1:00 am
This is a decision with the second highest distribution classification 'B'. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 11:00 am
Once again, B is worse than A but here there is a serious absolute problem, not just a relative one. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:55 pm
The Court of Appeals explained that under the statutory definition, an alternative fuel mixture is “a mixture of alternative fuel and taxable fuel (as defined in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 4083(a)(1)) which— (A) is sold by the taxpayer producing such mixture to any person for use as fuel, or (B) is used as a fuel by the taxpayer producing such mixture. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
§ 100.3(b)(2) and 24 C.F.R. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:07 am
Now, with the Court’s new ruling in Potomac, I’m left wondering why. [read post]
