Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 4,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2012, 7:28 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
”United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 10:56 am
Trump v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am
(I briefly discussed this idea in More on Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons.) [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am
” Chappuis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:55 am
" The Court has said in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
Watson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
”7 The statute lists several categories of works which may be protected, including “(1) literary works; (2) musical works, including any accompanying words; (3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music; (4) pantomimes and choreographic works; (5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; (6) motion pictures and other audiovisual works; (7) sound recordings; and (8) architectural works. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:24 am
In judging the affirmative action program in Fisher v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 4:00 pm
That makes Wiley v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 6:45 am
" http://pjblack.me/RGVS2y #highered good question: "In The Age Of Cloud Music, The iPod Nano End [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:00 am
This fall term, the United States Supreme Court will hear Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
State courts will have their own unique rules. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:01 am
This Court’s decision is the culmination of a lengthy lawsuit, The Matter of 677 New Loudon Corporation v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
By statute in New York state, taxes may not be imposed on admission fees for "dramatic or musical arts performances. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 590 (1994). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
.” Pallante’s remarks, as she notes herself in her response to Lofgren, are primarily a restatement of what the Supreme Court said in Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
