Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 5,964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 1:26 pm
But because crossover marks (at least theoretically) the deadline by which non-revenue bills must pass one chamber of the legislature in order to be considered by the other during the remainder of the session, it is a good time to take stock of pending legislation. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
A few months ago, Harvard Business Review published a great piece by Dominic Barton and Mark Wiseman titled Where Boards Fall Short. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:53 am
The court noted that when matters had reached crisis mode, Stanford sent a letter to calm investors, despite having no basis for the statements in his letter that SIBL was in good financial health. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:43 pm
Lehrman, Attorney UK obtained a federal trademark registration for KENTUCKY for clothing and other goods in 1997, after alleging it had acquired distinctiveness in the mark through its substantially exclusive and continuous use of the mark in connection with these goods. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am
At the same time S.4 of the Sale of Goods Act 1893, which required writing as a condition of the enforceability of contracts for the sale of goods of the value of £10 or upwards, was repealed. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
Good day for maple leaf growers? [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 5:30 am
Usurpations required efforts to mark the act as outside the acceptable bounds of the Constitution and necessarily void. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:19 am
This Kat has noticed in the past that, while his good friends at the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) are getting very good at examining Community trade mark (CTM) applications, weeding out the not-so-registrable ones and generally running the CTM system smoothly, they do have their blind spots. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 12:03 am
Send letters wherever you think they might do some good. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:59 am
Farm & City, however, prevailed on its innocent infringement defense, limiting its potential liability for statutory damages: Farm & City submitted undisputed evidence that it did not know PIC existed until this lawsuit was filed, that it obtained all of the images at issue from Orgill free of copyright markings, and that Orgill never advised it of any limitations on its use of the images. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 10:06 am
Tries to analyze past matters but the data are not very good. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 8:23 am
Mark Chandler, General Counsel, Cisco Systems called value subjective. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:26 am
Edenborough suggests that the ECJ is putting too many functions on a trade mark and we should really go back to the good ol' days of trade mark origin. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
But this doesn’t help, b/c then we need to know what’s necessary. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:10 pm
So watch out for Case C-260/12 P Volkswagen AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 7:06 am
Fortunately BMW came to the rescue again: in Commercial Auto Glass (Pty) Ltd v BMW AG 2007 (6) SA 637 (SCA) para [9] the court held that, while a phrase like ‘BMW spare part’ by a third party would infringe, a statement such as ‘spare part for BMW vehicle’ would enjoy the protection of section 34(2)(c) - a trade mark is not infringed by ‘the bona fide use of the trade mark in relation to goods or services where it is reasonable to… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
Tufty says, it's good and helpful to learn that the claimant in these proceedings is W**********. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
This was as good as it was going to get for Costco, however. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 4:43 am
Good news colleagues! [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:09 pm
Are the assets in good working condition? [read post]
