Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 19,799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2022, 2:26 am
Jet Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
That lawsuit, Boudreaux v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
If the defendant isn’t offering a good or service in commerce, how can he have used the plaintiff’s mark IN COMMERCE? [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Wychavon DC v EM is a double decision, so to speak, by Judge Mark on a housing benefit matter, with broader implications regarding incapacity. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Wychavon DC v EM is a double decision, so to speak, by Judge Mark on a housing benefit matter, with broader implications regarding incapacity. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
Although the regulations governing use of a Community collective mark must authorise any person whose goods or services do originate in the geographical area as a member of the proprietor association, it does not prevent that association from stating in those regulations that undertakings which collaborate with bodies whose goods originate from the geographical area or use the goods of the association as their raw materials, without being established in, or having their goods… [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 4:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:10 am
In State of Montana v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:13 pm
The statute states that dilution by blurring happens when the “association arising from the similarity between a mark or a trade name and a famous mark that impairs the distinctiveness of the famous mark. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 4:56 am
Fair Indigo LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
In a guest post, Mark Hill looks at an interesting judgment from Uganda on the limits of the secular courts’ jurisdiction over the internal affairs of Churches. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:09 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:59 am
Case Citation: Davis v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:08 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:31 am
Jackson Int’l Trading, 2012 TTAB LEXIS 246, at *6; Hornby v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:36 am
Boi Na Braza, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Sock It To Me, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:56 am
On rehearing, the Marks decision breaks the other way The Texas Supreme Court granted rehearing in Marks v. [read post]
