Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 2661 - 2680
of 21,682
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm
See Kisor v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 11:05 am
Dureska [3/4/22] Recently, the Supreme Court of the United States denied review in Savannah College of Art and Design v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:45 am
S. 257, 264 (1978) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
Its autumnal character--soft, yellowing, and progressing from drowsiness to sleep, marks a certain stage in the progress of people, and perhaps of states. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 9:19 am
Then, in Iancu v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:04 am
Pix Credit HEREThe folks over at the Völkerrechtsblog have posted an excellent essay by Andrew Forde (Visiting Fellow at the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland, Galway). [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:31 am
Healthvana, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:19 am
Tam, the Board struck down the "disparagement" provision and in Ianco v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am
Inc. v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:49 pm
State Grange v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:38 pm
It also disputed Russia’s claims of genocide organized by Ukraine in the Luhansk and Donetsk separatist regions, which the Russian president, Vladimir V. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 3:38 pm
It also disputed Russia’s claims of genocide organized by Ukraine in the Luhansk and Donetsk separatist regions, which the Russian president, Vladimir V. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 1:25 pm
Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 1:32 pm
Yesterday, in Coalition for TJ v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:42 am
Bruce Fischer, Esq., P.C., 78 AD3d 1016, 1018 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:18 pm
The context for this dispute flows out of the earlier (and un-appealed) CIT decision in Energizer v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
’” Time, Inc. v. [read post]