Search for: "People v J."
Results 2661 - 2680
of 7,244
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 5:01 am
Aside from these folks, there are people who, when asked to give their age, provide different answers to different people. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
”[10] Fourth, the plaintiffs’ claims were before Chief Judge Nancy J. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
Fortunately this particular matter has been considered and largely rejected by the UK courts (see Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] EWHC/Ch/25 ) As mentioned, there is quite a bit of case law on the public interest issue, and those interested in it may find it helpful to read a summary by Jacob J(as he then was) in his first instance hearing of Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland case (see paras [24-34]). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:47 am
Lang J was inclined to the view that the terms of PSO 6300 reflected a policy that CRL could, in principle, be available at any stage of a prisoner’s sentence, provided other eligibility criteria were met. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:03 pm
[v]. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:05 pm
” Thomas J. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
Many academic people have been pushing and pushing to eliminate "written description. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
Reynolds andJennifer J. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
On 20 to 23 February 2023 Heather Williams J heard the trial in the case of Hay v Cresswell. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
” For Kearns J (citing McKenna v An Taoiseach (No.2) [1995] 2 I.R. 10) the issue of justiciability came down to whether the case involved “a clear disregard by the Government of the powers and duties conferred on it by the Constitution”. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:31 am
Timothy J. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
This contrasted with a more applicant-oriented description of the scheme given by Sedley LJ in R (Saadat) v Rent Service [2002] HLR 32: The fundamental purpose of the housing benefit scheme … is to ensure that people who are not under-occupying property and not over-paying rent are not made homeless through genuine inability to pay. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:24 am
J. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
Knaub https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/J-S03016-24m%20-%20105928903265254505.pdf? [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the state’s highest court ruled in People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm
Butler (The Ohio State University) on priests claiming sanctuary and serfs vs. slaves in medieval England, Krista J. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:30 am
In the case of Roegner v. [read post]
