Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 3,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
Watson v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 1:39 pm
Novartis AG, California Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty., Transcript of Oral Argument on Post-Trial Motions, at 46 -47 (March 18, 2004) (Hon. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
Zarco Hotels Inc., Case No. 22STCV07447 (Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles) You can download a copy of the Court’s Order here. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:55 am
A California federal court said so in Laster v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
These are analogous powers that the English Superior Courts had under the prerogative writs of mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, habeas corpus and quo-warranto. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 9:16 am
The plainest example is in Georgia v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm
In the case of all natural rights, the people understood that the government’s role was to preserve natural rights against interference from private actors and to restrain the exercise of these natural rights in circumstances where the people’s representatives in the legislature had determined that such restraint was for the public good. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:04 pm
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm
After the Supreme Court invalidated the use of race in college admissions in SFFA v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Edwards v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 7:13 am
On virtually every dimension, Ludwin said, centralized services are superior to decentralized ones. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:34 pm
Brinegar v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:15 am
In People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
This year, the Supreme Court of Canada will likely decide Canadian National Railway v McKercher LLP. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 15, 2008 Chhay v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 7:48 am
County Superior Court claiming $10 million in damages for defamation and false light invasion of privacy. [read post]
