Search for: "Perry v Perry" Results 2661 - 2680 of 3,329
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am by Matt Sundquist
” Because the majority concluded that the lower court acted in haste, and neglected federal law, and because the Court is not subject to Federal Judicial Conference rules, the Court’s decision blocking broadcasts in Perry v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:25 am by Howard Friedman
Yesterday the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in Croft v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 1:29 pm by SOIssues
Since that decision, the US Supreme Court has only made one single ruling against any sex offender laws; the Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:34 am by Meg Martin
Perry, Judge.Representing Appellant Johnson: Kenneth DeCock of Plains Law Offices, LLP, Gillette, Wyoming.Representing Appellee State: Bruce A. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Meg Martin
Perry, Judge.Representing Jones: Michael H. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
You can see the C-SPAN list below the fold. 2000-2001 Term 1-Dec Bush v Palm Beach County Canvassing Board – Agreed 11-Dec Bush v Gore – Agreed 2002-2003 Term 1-Apr Grutter v Bollinger – Agreed 1-Apr Gratz v Bollinger – Agreed 2003-2004 Term 8-Sep McConnell v FEC – Agreed 20-Apr Rasul v Bush and Al Oday v US – Agreed 27-Apr Cheney v US District Court – Agreed 28-Apr Hamdi… [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:10 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0115, 2010 MT 80, PERRY ASHBY and KATHERINE ASHBY, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:47 am by Steve Hall
The Pulitzer prize-winning UT scholar's latest book is Capital Punishment on Trial: Furman v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Of note:  Perry is not the only "gay-rights" case percolating through the federal courts at the moment; also destined for certiorari is Gill v Office of Personnel Management. [read post]