Search for: "SCOTT v. UNITED STATES" Results 2661 - 2680 of 3,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552,  and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
(IP finance) Five file-sharing predictions for 2009 (TorrentFreak) George Michael offers free download of new track (TorrentFreak)   Belgium Registrar for .be domain names announces alternative dispute resolution tax to be reimbursed to successful complainants, from February 2009 (Class 46)   Canada IP & internet law in 2009 (ipblog.ca) Canadian digital music sales growth beats the US for third consecutive year (Michael Geist)   China Software resale: a China IP… [read post]
In Section 2202, the PRA provides that the United States owns “Presidential records. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
Acclaim for Obama’s actions rang loudly from The United Steelworkers. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am by INFORRM
IPSO 01503-24 Barrett v Eastern Daily Press 12 Discrimination No breach – after investigation 01581-24 Mallon v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy, 12 Discrimination No breach – after investigation 04272-24 Various v The Star (Sheffield), 1 Accuracy Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 00370-24 Hewitt v belfasttelegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy Breach – sanction: publication of correction 03831-24 Various v The Daily Telegraph,… [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am by Erica Canas
And, as with other useful arts, the United States, and most other countries, recognize the importance of protecting the intellectual property rights of the designers, inventors, artisans and engineers responsible for creating furniture designs. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 7:18 am
Johnson, Faculty Director, PAP; Geoff Gunnerson, Student Director, PAP; Scott L. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:12 am by Cody Poplin
” The United States has finalized a 25-year agreement with Australia that will double the number of American troops training with Australian security forces, according to Defense One. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:37 pm by Daniel Low
The Parties agree that the United States District Court for Minnesota shall retain jurisdiction over the Action to enforce this Agreement. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:22 am by Ron Coleman
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has dredged up an old Kentucky opinion from 2003, United State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:15 pm
No question was raised as to petitioner's loyalty to the United States. . . . [read post]