Search for: "STATE v CLARK" Results 2661 - 2680 of 3,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2011, 8:31 am by Dennis Crouch
[Link] Supreme Court will hear Global-Tech Appliance v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Gama Endustri Tesisleri Imalat Montaj AS v Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment [2005] IEHC 119 (22 April 2005) (Kelly J), Cogley v Radio Telifís Eireann [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005) (Clarke J) and Murray v Newsgroup Newspapers [2010] IEHC 248 (Irvine J) are all to similar effect. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:19 am
There only one case listed in the Supreme Court this week: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
UK will not defy European court over votes for prisoners, says Kenneth Clarke – guardian.co.uk: The Guardian reports that Kenneth Clarke, the Justice Secretary, has stated that the UK government has to comply with the European Court of Human Rights’ judgment that the blanket ban on disenfranchising prisoners was a violation of their human rights. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Moore Lincoln Boulevard, PO Box 249 Shawneetown, Illinois 62984-0249 Phone: 618/269-3140 Fax: 618/269-4324 Greene V. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:17 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Minkin v Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor [2011] EWHC 177 (QB) (07 February 2011) Royal Bank of Scotland Invoice Discounting Ltd & Anor v Manuel [2011] EWHC 174 (QB) (04 February 2011) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd [2011] EWHC 179 (QB) (07 February 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Clarke v Meadus [2011] EWHC 180 (Ch) (07 February 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Cala Homes (South) Ltd v… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:00 am
Austin v- Metropolitan Police Commissioner was brought by a demonstrator who attended anti-capitalist protests in London in 2001. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
The recent decision of the Mr Justice Christopher Clarke in Wallis v Meredith ([2011] EWHC 75 (QB)) resulted in the Claimant’s case being struck out on the basis that there had been no real or substantial tort following Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc ([2005] QB 946). [read post]