Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 11:30 pm
This case would represent a chance for the Irish judiciary to look at again at the Crotty v An Taoiseach, a case recalled with admiration by the barrister Vincent Martin in today’s Irish Times. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
Next week in the courts On Monday 21 May 2012 the libel trial of Miller v Associated Newspapers will begin before Sharp J, sitting without a jury. [read post]
20 May 2012, 12:56 pm
” Coates v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:54 pm
See Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:54 pm
See Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:39 pm
In sharp contrast to the Eighth Circuit’s recent ruling in EEOC v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:28 pm
See Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:22 pm
The other day we saw a TwIqbal article on a BNA news letter written by a couple of Arnold & Porter lawyers (Agneshwar and Sharpe). [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:04 am
Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 686-87 (1985). [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:24 pm
However, there is no shortage of cases in which such appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the original requests for payment did not constitute “claims” under the CDA.One recent illustration of this problem involved the distinction between routine and non-routine requests for payment, as addressed by a recent split-panel decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Parsons Global Services, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
On 11 May 2012, Sharp J handed down judgment in the case of King v Grundon. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:08 am
P’Ship v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 7:28 am
That is why, in the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts declared, in Goodridge v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am
California Court Declines to Follow Race Tires, Allows Taxation of eDiscovery Costs - bit.ly/IZoWhW (K&L Gates) Peck Wins By Submission; Parties Get Shot At Title Fight - bit.ly/Jfheio (eLessons Learned) Random Sample Calculations And My Prediction That 300,000 Lawyers Will Be Using Random Sampling By 2022 – bit.ly/IBIaZ5 (Ralph Losey) “Reasonableness” is Key When Assessing E-Discovery Efforts – bit.ly/IZp7d9 (Mike Hamilton) Reducing… [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am
(Eugene Volokh) From ACLU v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:00 pm
; Helferich Patent Licensing v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:00 pm
; Helferich Patent Licensing v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:36 pm
Sharpe. [read post]
