Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 2661 - 2680 of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 4:47 pm by David Munkittrick
Earlier this year in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm by Unknown
Erickson (Tribal Courts; Child Custody) State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 11:02 am by Unknown
United States (24-291) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html Hendrix v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 9:30 am by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
*Unpublished Opinion The Court of Appeals recently rendered an unpublished opinion in  Harbour Island Condominium Owners Association, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am by Beth Van Schaack
  Whether the Claims Sufficiently “Touch and Concern” the United States. [read post]
23 May 2013, 3:25 pm
However, in April 2013, the United States Supreme Court ruled on this issue in Missouri v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
We, therefore, order the United States to release Medina–Lara from custody immediately. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Bayer Corp., 564 U.S. ---, 131 S.Ct. 2368, 2011 WL 768649 (6/16/11) (blogged here) the Supreme Court of the United States held that a District Court's denial of a Rule 23 class certification motion does not prevent separate plaintiffs from seeking certification in a separate state court action. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:32 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
United States District Court Judge Janet C. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Ethan Yan
For those who haven’t looked at that Amendment recently, its words provide, quite straightforwardly, that, for citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen, the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age” (emphasis added).Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas grant absentee-voting eligibility specifically for all voters sixty-five or older, while… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
A recent decision was issued by a California appellate court that, while not controlling in the State of Ohio, is worth mentioning as it could prove useful to guarantors in other jurisdictions in similar straits. [read post]