Search for: "State v. Bill" Results 2661 - 2680 of 19,646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
  Pressser, the Ninth Circuit said, only rejected one theory, or at most two theories, of “incorporating” part of the Bill of Rights to apply to the states, leaving open the third theory — one-by-one, or selective, incorporation of specific rights toward the states through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 8:57 pm
" The case is Carpenters Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:02 pm by Dan Flynn
” The agreement, signed by FSIS Administrator Alfred V. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:28 pm by Kyle T. Mordew
Our last case law discussion comes to us from the Ohio Supreme Court in Embassy Healthcare v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 7:47 pm
The first bill that President Obama has signed while in office was the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, signed on Thursday, January 29th, and which overturns the 2007 US Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:00 pm by Unknown
S.2167/H.R.4052 - A bill to establish a national, research-based, and comprehensive home study assessment process for the evaluation of prospective foster parents and adoptive parents and provide funding to States and Indian tribes to adopt such process. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:23 am by Gerard Magliocca
One final note–Bingham’s ante-bellum argument was consistent with Barron v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm
Since all of the requested information was not provided, the 30-day period in which Progressive was obligated to pay or deny the Hospital's claim did not begin to run as was held in Westchester Medical Center v State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co., Hospital for Joint Diseases v New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Co, New York & Presbyterian Hosp v Countrywide Insurance Co. and Montefiore Medical Center v Government Employees Insurance Co. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:12 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Specifically, the bill states that “[i]f the Secretary requires sponsors seeking a [PRV] to demonstrate a good faith intent to market the rare pediatric disease product in the United States, the Secretary shall first issue a guidance document setting forth the required evidentiary support necessary to demonstrate such a good faith intent. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But in California, the state’s highest court enforced a surrogacy agreement in 1993, in Johnson v. [read post]