Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 27,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
They argue that, because the Supreme Court stated that Civil Code section 1717 bars contractual attorneys' fees in voluntarily dismissed cases only with respect to "causes of action sounding in contract" (Santisas v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
(Karner v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:16 pm
While most of this opinion has nothing to do with class actions and everything to do with whether a judge can sua sponte reconsider a prior order and then recuse himself in the same minute order, Bates v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
Republican State Leadership Comm., supra (citing Ashcroft v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:24 pm
Interserve v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:27 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 7:09 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:48 am
Click here to read this decision, Slayton v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:55 pm
R. 1201 To amend title 17, United States Code, to promote innovation, to encourage the introduction of new technology, to enhance library preservation efforts, and to protect the fair use rights of consumers, and for other purposes. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
Eagle US 2, LLC v Abraham, 627 Fed.Appx. 351 (5th Cir. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:18 am
In Lapidus & Associates LLP v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 2:25 pm
ShareMonday’s arguments in Lac du Flambeau Band v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:09 am
However, there was a subsequent change in the law when the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bullock v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
In Antonio Pulido et al., v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:25 pm
In Matter of Atlantic Development LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:25 pm
In Matter of Atlantic Development LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:03 pm
The Texas Supreme Court's perversion of Texas law in Haygood v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:48 am
Transpetrol v Slovakia, Application no. 28502/08 - read judgment The facts of this case can be stated very briefly, since the main (and most interesting) question before the Curt was whether the applicant company constituted a “victim” of a human rights violation under the Convention. [read post]
