Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 2661 - 2680 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2013, 7:02 am by Deborah A. Roy
  After slowly proceeding through the Alabama state courts, the appeals made their way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:01 am
  This point is argued on appeal, but rejected by the court. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:51 am by joseph bahgat
For what it's worth, the scope of review in New Jersey is consistent with the federal standard, and the standards held by most states, as restated recently in State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Appellate Division distinguished this case from its decisions in Rosenberger v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Appellate Division held that the Supreme Court erred in granting the plaintiff's motion to strike stated paragraphs of the defendant's counterclaim on the grounds of res judicata, collateral estoppel, and equitable estoppel. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:00 pm by admin
In analyzing this case, the Court first looked at State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:14 am by Geraldine Davila Gonzalez
Bookfinders argued its case for a refund of VAT in a series of unsuccessful appeals, first to the Appeal Commissioner, the High Court, then the Court of Appeal and ultimately the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
I was an intellectual property (IP) lawyer before joining CanLII and although I wasn’t a litigator per se, I was routinely involved in IP cases before the Federal Court. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 10:30 am by MBettman
  The case was accepted on certified questions from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division Read the analysis of the merit decision here. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:50 am
Levy, partners with Rivkin Radler, write that almost five years ago, the Court of Appeals issued its watershed decision in State Farm Mutual Auto. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:12 am by Joel R. Brandes
On appeal, the Appellate Division reversed and reinstated the complaint (73 A.D.3d 52 [2010] [ Dickerson I ] ), holding that the courts of this state may recognize the civil union status of the parties as a matter of comity and that Supreme Court is vested with subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 7:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
” The Appeal Division in Goldfinger also referenced another complaint in Law Society of Ontario v. [read post]