Search for: "State v. Deans"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 2,938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2024, 4:19 am
” In 2009, in his last will and testament, Egan nominated as his executor Dean George Pappas (“Pappas”), and attempted to bequeath his partnership interest to Pappas as follows: “I give, devise and bequeath all my right, title, shares of stock and interest in B & G Holding Company to DEAN GEORGE PAPPAS, outright, absolutely and forever. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Also, the Max Planck Study on the Overall Functioning of the European Trade Mark System of February 2011, stated that current European Court of Justice jurisprudence on the issue was "neither consistent nor satisfactory" (see paragraph 2.178 here). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
In the House of Lords, the Chagos Islands case (R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] UKHL 61) because of the historical constitutional and international legal interest and its continuing ramifications which one follows both internationally and actually domestically. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:16 pm
App. 2003); Gorman v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
From a Justice Department press release in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
To acquire or dispose of an asset, including real or personal property in this or another state, for cash or on credit, at public or private sale, and to manage, develop, improve, exchange, partition, change the character of, or abandon an estate asset; v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
In the 2004 decision, McConnell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Although plaintiff did not pursue her cross appeal, plaintiff's counsel stated in an affirmation that the cross appeal involved a narrow issue that appellate counsel had indicated did not affect her fee. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court has now heard oral arguments in two gerrymandering cases this term, and the world wonders whether Justice Anthony Kennedy will at last carry through on his suggestion in 2004’s Vieth v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Trump, California v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:24 am
I was discussing the Fourth Circuit case of Porter v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm
At this point I’m reminded of the opening statement of one Vincent LaGuardia Gambini in the fictitional trial of Alabama v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am
This can be no accident since ‘reasonable’ is an integral part of the Campbellformulation, and can be traced back in turn to a 1960 US paper on Privacy by Dean William Prosser. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 4:56 am
Paul Oberhammer, speaking both as Dean of the Law Faculty of the University of Vienna and chair of the first day, the first session of the conference dealt with international insolvency law: Prof. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 12:35 pm
State policy required the University to “[v]erify” Oyama’s “ability to function effectively in Department classrooms” before approving his student teaching application. [read post]
