Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 2661 - 2680 of 5,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 3:36 am
The Supreme Court granted cert. today in a case, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:49 am
If the mouse weighs heavily in your hand and you can't be bothered to click, but just want to know the question, this is it: "Are non-Community goods bearing a Community trade mark which are subject to customs supervision in a Member State and in transit from a non-Member State to another non-Member State capable of constituting "counterfeit goods" within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) of Regulation 1383/2003/EC if there is no… [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
He doubts that the courts will embrace the reform project the book advances (fair enough) and wonders if it will do much good, even if adopted. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
  The odds of that are about as good as the Bears coming home next January with a Lombardi Trophy, but hey, it could happen. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 4:37 pm
For good cause, this period may be enlarged at the discretion of the United States Magistrate Judge assigned to the case. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It leaves us with few to blame but ourselves.[2] That’s in good times.We are not living in good times. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:16 am by Doug Cornelius
The Delaware court sets the standard of review using the the four-factor formula set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm by Giles Peaker
This is such a mix of good points and, well, considerably less good points brought by NHG, but with no-one to argue against them. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Mountain States (Patently-O) Court of Appeal of Michigan – Malpractice: Failure to thoroughly advise in settlement negotiations: Viking Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 1:16 pm by Jamie Markham
Technically the defendant bears the burden of establishing a good faith inability to pay, State v. [read post]