Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2013, 5:17 am
One case currently being litigated, Caner v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
by Dennis Crouch In WesternGeco v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
Holder 13-323Issue: Whether 8 U.S.C. [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:07 am
” Pew v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Justice Elena Kagan, writing for a unanimous court in Judulang v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), and Brnovich v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:27 am
In Verizon Communications Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
Unsuccessful: Lahoti v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
” An early decision stated that the Panel could perform “limited modest factual research,” InfoSpace.com, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 8:06 am
Those new restrictions were imposed by the Commission measure and the member States implementing it were left with no discretion as to how to apply it (see, Case C-386/96 P Dreyfus v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 6:55 am
This legislative development (much like the adoption of Regulation M-A back in 2000 and the SEC's amendment of the "all-holders/same price" Rules last decade) should lead to an increase in the use of the tender offer structure for negotiated acquisitions. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
FEC, McCutcheon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:48 am
Like those other decisions (as well as Perry v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:32 am
Within Alphonse v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:46 am
” In FTC v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:45 am
But see United We Stand Am., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:41 pm
Microsoft intervened and ultimately resolved the issue.Finally, Ericsson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am
., colour marks and 3D marks) (MHCS v EUIPO | Case T-274/20 and Guerlain v EUIPO | Case T-488/20), the risks of using a mark in a manner other than that registered (Fashioneast Sàrl v EUIPO | Case T-297/20) and taking unfair advantage of the reputation of a well-known mark (Asolo Ltd. v EUIPO | Case T-509/19) and the importance of presenting valid arguments for the existence of a link between the marks - even in the case of marks with an exceptional… [read post]
