Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 2661 - 2680
of 51,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2009, 5:02 am
In Lord Osunfarian Xodus v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 12:14 pm
Olney (Criminal Jurisdiction) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlDiana v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 11:38 am
No one could deny that Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, and Davis v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court's decision last week in Tapia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
Finally, as the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm
Well, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has affirmed the District Court’s well-crafted opinion in Tibble v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm
The individual plaintiffs in California v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:26 am
Respondent’s mother stated that Respondent and the child were welcome to live with the family for as long as they would like. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
It was not because nationals other Member States may qualify for the Credit in question (Lord Hope, giving the main judgment, states in terms that “had a right to reside in the United Kingdom…been the sole condition of entitlement to state pension credit, it would without doubt have been directly discriminatory on grounds of nationality”: para 26); it was because not all UK nationals would be able to meet the test of habitual residence (“some UK… [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:11 am
" The Supreme Court held in American Airlines v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:53 am
At SSRN, Bryan Lammon explains why United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:36 am
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:33 am
(United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 10:33 am
(United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:08 am
In FTC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:52 pm
Citing to United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:51 pm
Gates and Jawad v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]