Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2008, 11:20 am
Wathne's favor . [7]On December 7, 2007 the Defendant entered into an agreement with the United States and agreed to return to voluntarily return to the United States, "on the condition that the United States agrees that he shall retain any and all rights he may have possessed under the Extradition treaty. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
Notably, Lord Bingham’s judgment began:“A general public duty to house the homeless or provide for the destitute cannot be spelled out of article 3. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
It considers how the test is applied by national trade mark registries across EU member states, by the EUIPO, by national courts, and by the CJEU. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
HXZH34FFD2CVLORD MANCE (with whom Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption agree)Introduction1- By its judgment in this appeal dated 24 March 2010 the Supreme Court referred to the Court of Justice five questions regarding the nature and assessment of the concept of "paid annual leave" in articles 7 of Council Directives 93/104/EC and 2003/88/EC and clause 3 of the European Agreement annexed to and intended to be implemented under Council… [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
HXZH34FFD2CVLORD MANCE (with whom Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption agree)Introduction1- By its judgment in this appeal dated 24 March 2010 the Supreme Court referred to the Court of Justice five questions regarding the nature and assessment of the concept of "paid annual leave" in articles 7 of Council Directives 93/104/EC and 2003/88/EC and clause 3 of the European Agreement annexed to and intended to be implemented under Council… [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:05 pm
State, 86 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (flimsy hollow plastic broomstick not a “deadly weapon”); Lee v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Dykes v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:45 pm
Finding in favour of Carrington the Court stated that such an action by the State was a gross infringement of his rights: “The warrant is to seize all the plaintiff’s books and papers without exception, and carry them before Lord Halifax; what? [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 2:26 pm
The IPKat hadn't forgotten the patent decision last week of the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) in Thorn Security Ltd v Siemens Schweiz AG [2008] EWCA Civ 1161 but there have been so many exciting distractions that he just hadn't got around to posting anything about it yet. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm
The House of Lords loses the plot The first seismic change in the law of defamation as it applies to the media occurred in 1999 in the case of Reynolds v Times Newspapers. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 6:00 am
One is being appealed in the normal way by the Secretary of State for Education, but the other may lead to a fundamental rethink of the Scottish justice system. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
The extent to which the state provides information and guidance to members of the public may be relevant here: the clearer the information from the state, the lower might be the public interest in knowing the details about particular cases. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am
The case will be heard on 13 and 14 November 2018 by Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am
United States On 2 December 2024, judgment was handed down dismissing the appeal in State of Washington v Meta Platforms, Inc., — P.3d —, 2024 WL 4929812 (Wash. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 2:11 pm
From Bailey v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 7:21 am
Moses v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
They claim that GCHQ has intercepted their communications in breach of the Wilson doctrine, which was thought to prohibit the agencies from eavesdropping on MPs or members of the House of Lords. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
In 1957 Lord Denning, speaking in a debate in the House of Lords on the Wolfenden Report, denounced homosexual acts as “unnatural vice” which “strikes at the integrity of the human race. [read post]
