Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2015, 4:06 pm
See Apple Computer v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:40 am
Galperti, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:10 pm
The trade mark owner sought surrender of the defendant's entire profits. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Wychavon DC v EM is a double decision, so to speak, by Judge Mark on a housing benefit matter, with broader implications regarding incapacity. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Wychavon DC v EM is a double decision, so to speak, by Judge Mark on a housing benefit matter, with broader implications regarding incapacity. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 4:56 am
Fair Indigo LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:58 pm
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 4:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Sock It To Me, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The second part of the judgment then focused on whether such violation was justified by the unique qualities of the property in question, the peculiarities of its discovery, or the Italian State’s interest in preserving the integrity of its cultural patrimony. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:02 pm
See Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:02 pm
See Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:26 am
Jet Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 11:43 am
The applications were accompanied by a description stating: “Colouring of vehicles in the colours red, white and orange, as shown”. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Theatrical Stage Employees Union Local No. 2 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In a nutshell, the Court held that DOMA was invalid because it marked a stark deviation from a long history and tradition of the federal government’s deferring to state-law determinations of marital status. [read post]
