Search for: "State v. Scales"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 4,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
Today, it is more than hard to imagine the Court ushering in such a regime on a grander scale. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 11:31 am
Without these, periodontal disease cannot be properly diagnosed and periodontal scaling and root planing should not be conducted. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 3:25 pm
Doe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
United States, are also the top two cases generating the most interest so far this term. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
Big Brother Watch said in its complaint to the ICO that PimEyes enabled “surveillance and stalking on a scale previously unimaginable. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, Justice Sotomayor’s opinion for the Court last year in Dubin v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am
The government's claim was that while in Nigeria and continuing when he came to the United States, he was involved in a `large-scale, Nigerian fraud scheme. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm
A stated that the defendant's primary drug of choice is marijuana but that he had used cocaine intermittently over a long period of time. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
The case is Morris v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 8:19 am
Ward v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In 2011 LegalZoom stated, “We have served approximately 2 million customers over the last 10 years. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 10:41 am
McFeeley v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am
In Al-Bihani v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:42 am
The case is Montana State Fund v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:54 pm
In fact such ‘honour killings', far from being honourable are nothing but pre meditated murder (Sujit Kumar and others v State of UP 2002 (45) ACC 79 at 80).Even the state discourses on "honour killings" in countries like Britain name the violence as "so-called honour crimes". [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:55 pm
On April 25, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on Arizona v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
Old Deuteronomy was stillYoung Deuteronomy when Diesel'smarks were first filedDiesel SpA v Montex Holdings Ltd is not a Trade Mark World War on the scale of the Battle of the Buds; it is however part of a family of disputes that have meandered through various European courts and trade mark registries since long before this blog was founded. [read post]
