Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 2661 - 2680 of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
The Consumer Fraud Act "protects people from those who substantially raise prices for needed goods or services without justification" according to the article. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:10 am
I am not a lawyer and I don't read German very well so it is difficult for me to understand where the case stands today. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:26 pm by schlangerlaw
Both consumer financial protection statutes provide for damages when these obligations aren’t met. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:26 pm by DanSchlanger
Both consumer financial protection statutes provide for damages when these obligations aren’t met. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/nans1qay6k -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-26 http://t.co/0rd9a1Odp7 -> Canadian green patents rocketing http://t.co/1hvkw2oKvU -> TekSavvy illegal downloading case risks bogging down legal system, judge says http://t.co/qdSkxVCWmc -> Music Canada AGM 2013 http://t.co/bURqOv4RAe -> Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Skype and Yahoo Hit With Prism Data Protection Complaints In Europ http://t.co/33HJWkmvea -> McCarthy Tétrault, the only… [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/nans1qay6k -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-26 http://t.co/0rd9a1Odp7 -> Canadian green patents rocketing http://t.co/1hvkw2oKvU -> TekSavvy illegal downloading case risks bogging down legal system, judge says http://t.co/qdSkxVCWmc -> Music Canada AGM 2013 http://t.co/bURqOv4RAe -> Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Skype and Yahoo Hit With Prism Data Protection Complaints In Europ http://t.co/33HJWkmvea -> McCarthy Tétrault, the only… [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Children’s data protection rights: a data protection casualty? [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
In Case T‑396/11, ultra air v OHIM - Donaldson Filtration Deutschland, the General Court examined the applicability of the concept of 'abuse of rights', in relation to an application for a declaration of invalidity of a Community trade mark, under Articles 56(1)(a), 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]