Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 49,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 7:16 am
Commentary on the Ninth Circuit (Opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:33 pm
Reasonable people should know that whenever you get a prescription filled, any law enforcement officer -- or any administrative officer with the state -- is entitled to know upon request what drugs you take. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
Beatson J first discusses the common law position that predated the Human Rights Act’s enshrinement of Article 10 into UK law. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:21 am
The people, not the government, bear the responsibility to discern the truth. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
That is, even if Congress had the votes, would rich people have any recourse through the courts? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 1:02 pm
Res. 75/314 Establishing a Permanent Forum of People of African Descent (U.N.), with an introductory note by Chantal Thomas Case of Guzmán Albarracín v. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 3:44 am
Judge Sean Cox’s decision in EEOC v. [read post]
Fisher v. University of Texas, Justice Kennedy, and the Text and History of the Fourteenth Amendment
28 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm
” In 2007, in Parents Involved v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:01 pm
Elizabeth Dale, People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:18 am
"In 1973, when Roe issued, abortion law was in a state of change across the nation. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
It is reported that the president of the Surrey Creep Catchers, a group that claims to expose people they allege are child sexual predators, is being sued for defamation. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:41 am
Vernon V. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:41 am
Vernon V. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 8:55 am
However, in its Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:38 pm
As the Court explained"Reversal [of that conviction and dismissal of the ninth count] is required because the jury may have convicted defendant of an unindicted [attempted murder], resulting in the usurpation by the prosecutor of the exclusive power of the [g]rand [j]ury to determine the charges" (People v McNab, 167 AD2d 858, 858; see People v Comfort, 31 AD3d 1110, 1111, lv denied 7 NY3d 847). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
By saying the law reaches only three entities, it downplays the law’s consequences. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
Over the summer at the annual health law professors’ conference organized by ASLME, I saw a wonderful presentation on Flynn v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:04 pm
” Howell v. [read post]
