Search for: "United States v. May" Results 2661 - 2680 of 47,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Employment issues to consider while awaiting decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) will imminently release its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and if the final ruling is consistent with the recently-leaked draft opinion (overturning Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey), employers may soon need to contend with a variety of… [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 3:05 pm
United States: Whether a federal circuit court may sua sponte increase a defendant's sentence in the absence of a cross-appeal by the government. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am by Kari Hong
Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that even though a speedy process may be permitted when someone has no claim to be in the United States, the question of whether the Constitution grants habeas corpus rights to someone “who had a legal claim to stay” is “vastly different. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
It has been suggested that the court may have been better off enforcing the 'equal' portion of Plessy v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:10 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Oklahoma v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:36 pm
§ 1498(a) The statute states:Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States . . . the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims . . . .28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]