Search for: "Washington v. Downes" Results 2661 - 2680 of 5,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 6:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In June 2005, while Redd was walking down the hallway with a co-worker, Washington "came up and she touched my breasts and rubbed up against it again in front of this parole officer. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Compare attractiveness of Simon Tam’s claim v. that of the Washington football team. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Benjamin Bissell
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm by INFORRM
On January 21, in its first decision of this term, Citizens United v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  As I wrote when the decision came down, the campaign started that instant. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm by Peter Tillers
This right includes 'the right to present the defendant's version of the facts,' Washington v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am by Sophia Tang
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm by Sophia Tang
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:38 pm
The sessions fueled speculation that the justices might strike down some or all of the statute. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am by Michael Froomkin
This was the start of my two-year term as a member of the DHS Data Privacy and Integrity Advisory Committee (the DPIAC — pronounced “dippie-ack”) — some two years after being asked to apply — and I attended my first meeting today in Washington DC, which was a public meeting of the committee. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
In the era of abortion regulation and the wind-down of the COVID-19 public health emergency (“PHE”), new legislation in states such as Utah may be a sign of what is to come for online and telehealth prescribing. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
The “Sister Wives” family challenged the law (represented by George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley), and a federal district court in Utah struck the law down on free exercise clause grounds, largely reasoning that the law was motivated by hostility to polygamist Mormons. [read post]