Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
By which I don't mean London.]Gill Grassie, vice convener of the Society’s Intellectual Property committee, said: “It is great news for Ireland that a local division of the Unified Patent Court has been secured there. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:00 pm
You know where that leads, don’t you? [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:32 pm
I don't think so. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 12:34 pm
Judge Paez explains that this theory doesn’t cut it. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
We love it.Since the Supreme Court never bothered to define “clear evidence” in Levine, the rulings in Rheinfrank and Depakoteprovide another fact pattern against which courts can judge post-Levinepreemption.These cases also disposed of several legal arguments against preemption. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 6:55 am
Natural biases we're hardly aware of influence how people view images on the screen. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 11:34 pm
Don't we think Booker or Blakely at least suggest that this kind of thing really ain't so kosher? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
Instead, this Court's precedent requires that we judge the truth or falsity of an allegedly defamatory statement by identifying the "gist" of what the statement conveys about the plaintiff to a reasonable reader of the entire article. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 10:53 am
I know which one I'd choose.So I don't know. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 1:14 pm
" Kavanaugh is a fan of Justice Scalia's that most acknowledge to have been solicitous of defendant's rights. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:09 am
And I just don’t see how this can happen with the presence of a law firm that, as we speak, represents Facebook. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 4:30 am
We should not expect substantial progress on the sorts of issues that ought to be at the top of the agenda: affordability; diversity in the wake of last year's affirmative action decision in the Harvard case; and defending academic freedom against assault by the likes of Ron DeSantis. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
I don't think so. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:35 am
“We don’t know what’s going on in that black box, and that is a legitimate question,” the scientist said, adding that evidence in older cases should “absolutely” be retested in light of growing questions about FST. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
Don't feed the failed-business-turned-troll! [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 10:07 pm
" We might be tempted to characterize it as an uncontrolled outburst of local Texan pride or a display of old-school "home cooking" (e.g., "'these Californians' should know that's not how we do things here in Texas"), but it appears that Judge Weiner is from Louisiana, so that dog won't hunt ("You Californians should know that's not how we do it in the… [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
Let’s start with the typical relists, and, if we aren’t all squashing our “H” and “J” keys with our noses while snoring loudly when we finish, maybe we’ll include a word or two about the CFRecords. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:03 pm
The juror reportedly told colleagues that if defendant wasn't so stubborn, none of us would be here. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:01 pm
See you in Court, not (like Paul Newman did) asking questions we don't know the answer to. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:29 am
Heck, we can even use the word "respectfully" to judges we don't truly respect, even though we're "officers of the court. [read post]
