Search for: "A,B,C Insurance Companies"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 2,924
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2008, 9:36 am
The BMA anticipates this Order coming into force on 31 December 2008;(b) amendments to the Insurance Accounts Regulations 1980. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 3:58 pm
The Federal Deposit Insurance Company ("FDIC"), as conservator of IndyMac Federal Bank F.S.B. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
Plaintiff used a premium finance company, Standard Funding Corporation, to make the annual premium payment, and the finance agreement listed SJ International Brokers as the insured's agent. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:26 am
To accept additions to any estate or trust from sources other than the estate of the decedent, minor, mental incompetent or the settlor of a trust; b. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:54 pm
" Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
§ §341, 343(b), 343(c), 343(d), 343(e), 343(f), 343(g), 343(h), 343(i), 343(k), 343(q), or 343(r)) relating to food.Drug and device companies don't have that problem, which - as we explained in our prior post - is why the California Supreme Court had to jump through all the hoops it did to avoid preemption.So with this point in mind, we look at the defendants' certiorari petition in Albertsons/Farm Raised Salmon. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
C. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
We have this happen at least a couple of times a year: an out-of-state company calls us, tells us they were sued, they turned the summons and complaint over to (a) an insurer; or (b) their local counsel; or (c) to a clerk or a secretary or somebody in office, and now they have received a notice of entry of default.The common perception seems to be that we can get a default set aside just for the asking. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:44 am
Further, respected companies like AIG wrote insurance on these instruments on the theory that they would never have to pay. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:16 pm
Medicare consists of four parts -- Part A, Part B, Part C and part D. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
So 126(c) is like a law excusing me from enforcement or liability arising from the agreement you have with your phone company. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 7:17 am
Law § 3425(c)(2).Insurance Law § 3425(c) prevents an insurer from cancelling a personal lines insurance policy that has been in effect for more than 60 days, unless the cancellation is based on one of the permissible grounds set forth in the statute itself:(c) After a covered policy has been in effect for sixty days, or upon the effective date if the policy is a renewal, no notice of cancellation shall be issued to… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(RelatIP) New procedure at the Brazilian Patent Office for the application of article 32 of the Industrial Property Law (IP tango) Canada 30 more candidates add their support for the copyright pledge (Michael Geist) CBC on copyright pledge (Michael Geist) Copyright pledge gains momentum - Green Party and New Democrats Party (NDP) candidates on board (Michael Geist) Conservative Party platform on copyright (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Michael Geist) Copyright in local election debates (Michael… [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
Harco National Insurance Company, 129 F.3d 1072, 1074 (9th Cir. 1997) (independent contractors come within 49 C.F.R. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:16 pm
It is not taxpayer money that is being spent any more than it is taxpayer money being spent when you get into a car accident and ask your insurance company to pay your claim. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Seven million lost their health insurance. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
The court used the July 13, 2005 decision ("Parmalat III") to issue an extensive and scholarly analysis of the elements of a Rule 10b-5 claim, noting the difference between claims based on the (a), (b) or (c) subsections. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
(2) All of the funds in the account are covered by insurance provided by an agency of the federal government [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 7:49 pm
(B) To eliminate or correct encroachments due to errors in construction of any improvements. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 9:34 pm
Citing Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 351 NLRB No. 40 (2007), the judge reasoned that where employees are discharged for violating company work rules (here, the Respondent's drug and alcohol policies), the discharge is "for cause" under Section 10(c) of the Act, even if the employees' conduct is discovered by means of an unlawful unilateral change. [read post]
