Search for: "AT&T Communications"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 127,299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
As concerns inventive step the appealed decision in point 2 of the section “additional comments” said not to form part of the decision, refers to an objection raised in paragraphs 2.4 to 2.7 of the communication of 19 October 2007 issued in examination and which the division still held to be valid. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm
An apparatus state detector that detects states of at least one apparatus comprising:measuring means (110) that is configured to measure a physical quantity of an environment in which the apparatus is placed, said physical quantity being any of a value of current supplied to the apparatus, a flow rate of water used by the apparatus, a flow rate of gas used by the apparatus, illuminance of the environment in which the apparatus is installed, a temperature of the environment in which the apparatus is… [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 12:47 pm
(credit: Mike Mozart) AT&T is fighting a recent punishment handed down by the Federal Communications Commission. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:46 am
“This is very basic, elementary communication. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 10:01 pm
Booker T. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
These rules are enacted pursuant to the EPC (see A 23(4) and R 12(3)) and are binding on the BoA (Article 23 RPBA). [5] The basic principle relating to the conduct of appeal proceedings is to be found in Article 12(1) RPBA, which states that: “(1) Appeal proceedings shall be based on (a) the notice of appeal and statement of grounds of appeal, (b) any written reply of any other party and (c) any communication sent by the BoA and any answer thereto filed pursuant to directions of the… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 10:22 am
Sadly, ICE hasn't learned from its Maricopa mess: According to OIG, neither new 287(g) applicants nor community groups in their jurisdictions are asked for application information about civil rights records (and ICE frequently overrules its own field staff's take on where 287(g) should not be in force). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:32 am
” The merger also requires approval by the Federal Communications Commission. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 12:32 pm
Valuable to help as many clients as we can—the community is creative and innovative but hasn’t had resources to protect IP. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Lambertville resident, T. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:53 pm
The takedown of Megupload has affected not only its users, but the internet community as a whole. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:41 pm
DHS needs to push the "reset button" to make sure it's not wasting finite resources going after people who pose no threat to our communities. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 10:59 am
The technology that makes it possible to communicate makes it possible to monitor the communication, too. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 5:36 am
Apparently there are some things you aren’t allowed to be skeptical of within the skeptics community. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
I don't need that. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 9:20 am
In my humble opinion, the majority made a policy decision by contending that desegregation is good, but the way this community chose to go about it wasn’t effective. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 3:44 pm
The ordinance begins, as is customary, with various recitals; the first recital (which isn’t customary), says, “WHEREAS, We, the residents in Mora County, are a multi-cultural community with indigenous roots of Many. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
T 1242/04 [9.2] explains it this way: According to the established case law of the boards of appeal it is possible to raise an objection of lack of inventive step without documented prior art ? [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 11:28 am
Sometimes communication styles aren't as comfortable for one person as they may be for another. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
The two cited decisions T 569/02 and T 718/98 concern two cases different from the present wherein very shortly (i.e. one month and about one week, respectively) before the date of the scheduled OPs before the Board experimental evidence and other documents were submitted by parties, which then in accordance with the established case law decided not to admit these documents into the proceedings (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 6th edition 2010, chapter VII.C.1.3.4). [1.2.2]… [read post]
