Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 14,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2009, 12:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:31 am
’ United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”), in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 am
It states that “an examining officer may question a person to whom this paragraph applies for the purpose of determining whether he appears to be a person who [is or has been concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism]. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
" Further, said the court, the probationary employee bears the burden of establishing that his or her "dismissal was due to causes unrelated to work performance and/or improperly motivated. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
" Further, said the court, the probationary employee bears the burden of establishing that his or her "dismissal was due to causes unrelated to work performance and/or improperly motivated. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 7:52 am
Case Citation: Z.D. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:01 am
In Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 3:43 am
The court’s conclusion with respect to the penalty imposed by the arbitrator: the remedy of reinstatement without back pay and benefits was well within the arbitrator ‘s authority.On a related point, in Greenberg v Bear, Stearns & Co. [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:11 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
” The concurrence took aim at the Sixth Circuit precedent of United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 6:50 pm
Amerisource Corp. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 5:31 am
Follow the process of the still ongoing ConnectU v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision.Petitioner then commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the Comptroller's determination.Citing Matter of Bohlen v DiNapoli, 34 NY3d 434, the Appellate Division explained the "Comptroller is vested with exclusive authority to determine applications for retirement benefits and such determination, if supported by substantial evidence, must be upheld". [read post]
