Search for: "Bell v. State" Results 2681 - 2700 of 3,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
Introduction Depending on how the Court resolves a threshold issue, United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:08 pm by Jeff Sovern
In that decision, the Court extended the “plausibility test” first introduced two years earlier, in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:00 pm
McMahon (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google sued again for trade mark infringement in relation to AdWords program: Soaring Helmet v Leatherup.com (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Psystar – Psystar owes Apple $75,000 while Apple moves to lift stay in dispute over unauthorised Mac clones (Ars Technica)   [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 1:10 pm
” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2, no. 1 (1971): 3–21, p. 3. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
As a result, HDOH ordered this product embargoed (not to be sold, purchased, or consumed) throughout the state, and the temporary closure of all Genki Sushi restaurants on Oahu and Kauai. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
  It’s instinctive, like when Pavlov’s dogs heard that bell. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 7:43 am
The Court stated as follows: What determines when allurement/enticement should apply? [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]