Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 2681 - 2700
of 10,147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2019, 8:38 am
Clayton County, Georgia, Respondent (United States Supreme Court)FINRA Fines/Suspends Rep Over Mismarked "Solicitation. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 8:50 am
Last year, in Trump v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am
STATE V. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 3:15 am
Release date Aug 13 Order a copy in advance. https:/… 2019-09-23 Publishers Say Audible's 'Captions' Defense 'Makes No Sense' – Publishers Weekly https://t.co/LwUCaFwbHF 2019-09-23 OPC concludes consultation on transfers for processing reversing proposal to treat transfers for processing as disc… https://t.co/CKTTM8UiiC 2019-09-23 UKSC rules that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful R (Miller) v Prime Minister, Cherry & Ors v… [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Wade has already been overturned by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
Chief Justice John Marshall famously stated "[t]he government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Question: Henson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:32 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
” 1204: Michael Fordham QC refers to written submissions by the Public Law Project regarding bills falling away. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
”[3] This Final Rule set out a number of requirements that must be met by providers and suppliers in order to maintain their Medicare billing privileges. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
”[3] This Final Rule set out a number of requirements that must be met by providers and suppliers in order to maintain their Medicare billing privileges. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:04 am
“And with his four women as law clerks, it’s the first time in the history of the United States that there have been more women clerking at the court than men. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around… [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am
The details of the complaint remain vague, but Schiff stated that it was filed by an individual in the intelligence community and determined by Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson to be credible and a matter of “urgent concern. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
