Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 2681 - 2700 of 8,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 8:50 pm by Lauren Moak
The Superior Court’s opinion clarifies that an employee’s off-duty conduct must have a non-speculative impact on the employer’s business in order to constitute “just cause” for termination.A Hairy SituationThe case of Michael Christopher Designs v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:15 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Burrus.It is well settled that "the purpose of ... civil trials is to discover the truth" of the claims and defenses presented by the parties, as the court held in Bailey v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Accordingly, the Court remanded the action to the Superior Court. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm by Florian Mueller
On December 21, the Munich court will hold a FRAND hearing.Last week, the Mannheim Regional Court held the first of a series of Ericsson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 5:44 pm
Superior Court Judge Robert Dondero, sitting by assignment, concurred.All seven Supreme Court justices voted to grant review [.pdf] in People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 7:40 pm
Reviczky brought an Application in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice for a declaratin that the transfer in favour of Mr. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In Pusl, a three-judge panel of the Superior Court allowed the molding of a third-party verdict downward to reflect the previous UIM settlement secured by a plaintiff for the same accident and thereby prevent a double recovery.After Pusl, the plaintiffs bar switched back to the strategy pursuing the third-party liability claims first for several years until the 2012 decision of the Superior Court came down in Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Last week, the Illinois Supreme Court began hearing arguments from its civil docket with Skaperdas v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 7:54 am by John Jascob
The defendant below (petitioner in the Supreme Court), Cyan, Inc., lost its bid for judgment on the pleadings in the California Superior Court based on that court’s reading of a California appellate court opinion that previously held that concurrent jurisdiction in cases like this one still exists post-SLUSA. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 7:59 am by Jeff Welty
The defendant was convicted on both counts in district court and appealed for trial de novo in superior court. [read post]